Comparing Supervised and Unsupervised Learning in Physical Activity Analysis

Comparing Supervised and Unsupervised Learning in Physical Activity Analysis

1. Introduction

Welcome back to our mini-series on machine learning in health research! In this article, we will contrast supervised and unsupervised learning, highlighting their main differences and discussing when each method is most effective. We’ll also explore hybrid approaches that combine both methods for a more comprehensive analysis.

2. Differences Between Supervised and Unsupervised Learning

2.1. Supervised Learning
  • Definition: Utilizes labeled data to train models.
  • Objective: Predict outcomes based on input data.
  • Example: Identifying types of physical activities (e.g., walking, running) from accelerometer data.
  • Advantages:
    • High accuracy with properly labeled data.
    • Easier to interpret results.
  • Challenges:
    • Requires extensive labeled data.
    • Time-consuming and costly to label data.
2.2. Unsupervised Learning
  • Definition: Analyzes data without predefined labels to discover hidden patterns.
  • Objective: Identify structures and relationships within the data.
  • Example: Grouping individuals based on their physical activity patterns.
  • Advantages:
    • No need for labeled data.
    • Can uncover unknown patterns.
  • Challenges:
    • More challenging to interpret results.
    • Difficult to validate findings.

“Supervised learning uses labeled data for predictions, while unsupervised learning identifies hidden structures without prior labels.”

3. Applications in Physical Activity Research

3.1. When to Use Supervised Learning:
  • Classifying Activities: Useful when labeled accelerometer data is available to differentiate physical activities.
    • Example: Trost and O’Neil (2014) used labeled data to classify various physical activities, aiding in designing better fitness programs.
  • Predicting Health Risks: Ideal for predicting health outcomes based on historical data.
    • Example: Supervised models can forecast cardiovascular disease risk based on past physical activity levels.
3.2. When to Use Unsupervised Learning:
  • Cluster Analysis: Suitable for identifying groups with similar activity patterns without predefined labels.
    • Example: Troiano et al. (2008) used cluster analysis to segment populations based on their physical activity behaviors.
  • Anomaly Detection: Effective for spotting unusual patterns that may indicate health issues.
    • Example: John and Freedson (2012) detected periods of abnormal inactivity that could signal potential health problems.

4. Hybrid Methods

4.1. Semi-Supervised Learning
  • Definition: Combines a small amount of labeled data with a large amount of unlabeled data during training.
  • Advantages:
    • Reduces the need for extensive labeled data.
    • Enhances accuracy by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data.
    • Example: A study could use semi-supervised learning to improve physical activity classification by combining labeled data with a large set of unlabeled accelerometer readings.
4.2. Reinforcement Learning
  • Definition: The algorithm learns by interacting with the environment and receiving feedback through rewards or penalties.
  • Application: Can be applied in adaptive fitness programs where the algorithm learns optimal exercise routines based on user feedback.

“Hybrid approaches like semi-supervised and reinforcement learning combine the strengths of both supervised and unsupervised learning for more comprehensive analysis.”

5. Conclusion

Both supervised and unsupervised learning offer unique benefits and applications in physical activity research. Understanding when and how to use each method allows researchers to gain deeper insights and develop more effective health interventions.

In the next article, we’ll explore practical applications of these machine learning methods using accelerometry data. We’ll present real-world examples of studies that have successfully applied these techniques and discuss the technologies and tools used in these analyses.

  • Trost, S. G., & O’Neil, M. (2014). Clinical use of objective measures of physical activity. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(3), 178-181. Read more
  • Troiano, R. P., et al. (2008). Physical Activity in the United States Measured by Accelerometer. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Read more
  • John, D., & Freedson, P. (2012). ActiGraph and Actical physical activity monitors: a peek under the hood. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Read more

You Might Also Be Interested

🚀📊 Learn more about how Fibion SENS can help you in your projects measuring physical activity and sedentary behavior!

🔍 Elevate your project with Fibion SENS Motion 3 Devices Test Package for precise activity analysis. Order now for hands-on experience and comprehensive insights.

Discover the Fibion SENS Motion 3 Devices Comprehensive Package for just 590 euros. This complete set includes both the device and smartphone, ready for your motion test needs. Select your desired quantity and add to bag easily. In stock now!

📅 If you want to learn more about Fibion SENS, do not hesitate to book a video call with our expert Dr. Miriam Cabrita.

🔍 You may also discover other valid and reliable products in our portfolio, such as the Fibion Device, Fibion Sleep, Fibion Mimove, Fibion Vitals,  Fibion Emfit, and Fibion Circadian, all designed to assist in research measuring physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep.

Frequently asked questions:

What is the main difference between supervised and unsupervised learning? +

The main difference is that supervised learning uses labeled data to train models and make predictions, while unsupervised learning analyzes data without predefined labels to discover hidden patterns and relationships.

When should supervised learning be used in physical activity research? +

Supervised learning should be used when there is labeled accelerometer data available to classify activities or predict health outcomes. It is ideal for tasks like identifying types of physical activities or forecasting health risks based on historical data.

When should unsupervised learning be used in physical activity research? +

Unsupervised learning should be used to identify clusters of activity patterns or detect anomalies without labeled data. It is suitable for discovering groups with similar behaviors or spotting unusual patterns that may indicate health issues.

What are the benefits of supervised learning? +

Supervised learning offers high accuracy with well-labeled data and easier interpretability of results. It is effective for making precise predictions and understanding the relationship between input features and outputs.

What are the benefits of unsupervised learning? +

Unsupervised learning can handle large datasets without the need for labeling, saving time and resources. It is capable of uncovering hidden patterns that may not be immediately obvious, providing deeper insights into data.

What are hybrid methods in machine learning? +

Hybrid methods combine both supervised and unsupervised learning approaches to leverage their strengths. Examples include semi-supervised learning, which uses both labeled and unlabeled data, and reinforcement learning, where the algorithm learns from interaction with the environment.

Sign up for our Newsletter

Questions? Ask about Fibion!

Fill out the form below, and we will be in touch shortly.

Free resource

Accelerometers Comparison Sheet

Please provide your professional email address and we will send you an access link to the file. Personal email addresses will not be accepted.