How to Assess Physical Activity in Children with Mobility Limitations

1. Introduction

Assessing physical activity in children with mobility limitations presents unique challenges. Traditional activity metrics, such as step counts and movement intensity, often do not apply to children who use wheelchairs, walkers, or have asymmetric movement patterns. As a result, researchers and clinicians must use adapted assessment methods to ensure that physical activity is measured in a way that captures functional movement and participation, rather than simply tracking overall movement volume.

Physical activity plays a crucial role in physical health, cognitive development, and social participation for children with mobility impairments. However, these children often engage in movement patterns that differ significantly from typically developing peers, making standard tracking methods ineffective. Instead of focusing solely on traditional movement indicators, assessment strategies should be designed to evaluate functional mobility, upper-body movement, and participation in daily activities.

This article explores alternative approaches to assessing physical activity in children with mobility limitations, providing best practices for data collection, analysis, and application in clinical and research settings.

2. Understanding Mobility Limitations and Their Impact on Activity Assessment

Children with mobility limitations experience a wide range of movement challenges that require a more individualized approach to activity assessment. Depending on the condition, movement may be restricted, asymmetrical, or dependent on assistive devices, making it difficult to rely on step counts or intensity-based measurements alone.

• Types of mobility limitations and their effects on movement patterns:
  • Neurological conditions (e.g., cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy) can affect motor control, coordination, and muscle tone, resulting in variable movement patterns and difficulty with weight-bearing activities.
  • Orthopedic conditions (e.g., limb deformities, post-surgical recovery) may lead to gait irregularities, reduced joint mobility, or the need for prosthetics or orthotics.
  • Chronic conditions (e.g., cystic fibrosis, juvenile arthritis) can cause fatigue-related movement reductions, requiring adaptations to measure movement efficiency rather than intensity.
• Differences between ambulatory and non-ambulatory children:
  • Children who are ambulatory with assistance (e.g., using walkers or crutches) may still show lower movement intensity than their peers, requiring customized activity thresholds.
  • Non-ambulatory children, including those who use wheelchairs or other mobility aids, require assessment methods that focus on upper-body movement, wheelchair propulsion, and engagement in seated activities.
• Why standard activity metrics may not apply:
  • Step counts do not capture upper-body movements, which are essential for wheelchair users.
  • Activity intensity calculations may misclassify adapted movements as lower effort, even when they require significant energy expenditure.
  • Comparing movement levels to typically developing peers does not provide meaningful insights into functional ability or health outcomes.

Understanding these factors allows researchers and clinicians to adapt activity assessment methods to reflect real-world movement patterns, ensuring more accurate and meaningful data collection.

3. Alternative Methods for Assessing Physical Activity in Children with Mobility Limitations

Since traditional movement tracking tools may not fully capture activity levels in children with mobility challenges, researchers must adopt alternative assessment methods that account for adaptive movement strategies and assistive device use. Instead of relying solely on step counts and intensity scores, more comprehensive and inclusive measures should be considered.

Activity Monitoring Beyond Step Counts

Physical activity is more than just walking—for children with mobility impairments, upper-body activity, seated movement, and assisted mobility play a significant role in overall energy expenditure and functional engagement.

• Tracking arm movement and wheelchair propulsion allows for a better assessment of activity levels in non-ambulatory children.
• Measuring seated movement and postural shifts provides insights into core stability and engagement in daily activities.
• Assessing energy expenditure rather than movement intensity helps to capture the effort required for adaptive movements.

Adapting Accelerometer-Based Assessments

Accelerometers are commonly used to measure movement patterns, but standard algorithms may not accurately classify activity in children with mobility impairments. Modifications can improve relevance and accuracy.

• Using customized movement thresholds that account for lower movement intensity but higher energy demands.
• Focusing on movement efficiency rather than raw intensity—children using walkers, for example, may show lower total movement but higher exertion levels.
• Adjusting sensor placement to capture arm movement, push-rim propulsion, or postural adjustments, rather than only lower-body motion.

Observational and Caregiver-Reported Assessments

Since wearable devices alone may not fully capture functional activity, observational assessments and caregiver reports provide additional context.

• Functional mobility scales (e.g., GMFCS for cerebral palsy) classify movement ability rather than just movement volume.
• Parent-reported activity diaries help capture activities that are difficult to measure with sensors alone, such as assisted movement, standing transfers, or modified physical activities.
• Clinician-led movement assessments during rehabilitation sessions provide direct insight into functional progress over time.

By combining objective movement tracking, adapted sensor placements, and caregiver-reported measures, researchers can create a more comprehensive picture of activity levels in children with mobility limitations.

4. Best Practices for Data Collection in Children with Mobility Challenges

Collecting reliable activity data in children with mobility limitations requires careful adaptation of measurement techniques to ensure comfort, accuracy, and consistency. Unlike typically developing children, this population may have inconsistent movement patterns, reliance on assistive devices, or difficulty wearing certain types of sensors. Researchers and clinicians must take these factors into account when designing data collection protocols.

Combining Multiple Assessment Tools for a Complete Activity Profile

No single device can fully capture the complexity of movement in children with mobility challenges. To get a more complete understanding, researchers should combine multiple measurement tools to assess both objective movement data and functional mobility patterns. the complexity of movement in children with mobility challenges. To get a more complete understanding, researchers should combine multiple measurement tools to assess both objective movement data and functional mobility patterns.

• Wearable sensors (accelerometers, IMUs) provide real-time movement tracking but must be positioned appropriately to reflect actual mobility strategies.
• Direct observation and movement assessments in clinical or school settings help validate wearable data and identify movement adaptations.
• Caregiver and self-reported activity logs offer insight into participation in daily activities that may not be reflected in sensor data alone.

Ensuring Comfort and Feasibility of Activity Trackers

Children with mobility impairments may experienceHow to Assess Physical Activity in Children with Mobility LimitationsHow to Assess Physical Activity in Children with Mobility Limitationsnd medical equipment is crucial.

• Lightweight, flexible sensors reduce discomfort and make long-term wear more feasible.
• Customizable attachment methods (e.g., adaptive straps, clip-on sensors) allow for secure placement without restricting movement.
• Strategic placement on the body or mobility aid (e.g., wrist for upper-body movement, push-rims for wheelchair users) ensures meaningful data collection.

Minimizing Missing Data and Ensuring Compliance

Low adherence to wear time requirements can be a challenge, especially if children or caregivers do not see immediate value in tracking movement. Engaging families and healthcare providers can improve compliance.

• Educating caregivers and therapists on the importance of activity monitoring encourages participation.
• Providing simple, clear instructions on how to wear and charge the device reduces user error.
• Using reminder systems (text notifications, visual schedules) helps maintain consistent wear time.

By adapting device placement, combining multiple data sources, and improving engagement strategies, researchers can enhance the reliability of movement assessments in children with mobility limitations.

5. Interpreting Activity Data in Children with Mobility Limitations

Once movement data has been collected, the next step is interpreting it in a way that reflects real-world function and participation. Standard physical activity classifications often do not apply to children with mobility challenges, requiring adjustments in data analysis and interpretation.

Shifting Focus from Movement Volume to Functional Movement Patterns

Traditional activity tracking often categorizes movement based on intensity (light, moderate, vigorous), but this approach may be misleading for children with mobility impairments. Instead, researchers should focus on functional movement patterns and energy efficiency.

• Recognizing adaptive movement strategies (e.g., using arms instead of legs for mobility, repositioning frequently in a seated position).
• Identifying meaningful activity fluctuations rather than focusing on total movement volume.
• Measuring consistency of movement over time, rather than direct comparisons to typically developing peers.

Adjusting Data Analysis Methods for Mobility Limitations

Because many wearable devices are calibrated for typical gait and movement intensity, researchers must customize data processing techniques to account for mobility differences.

• Using individualized baseline measurements ensures activity comparisons are relevant.
• Adjusting movement thresholds to reflect the energy expenditure of adaptive mobility.
• Considering asymmetrical movement patterns (e.g., one-sided limb use, uneven gait) in data interpretation.

By focusing on functional mobility rather than standard activity cutoffs, researchers can draw more meaningful conclusions about a child’s physical activity level and rehabilitation progress.

6. How to Use Physical Activity Data to Support Interventions

Beyond assessment, activity data can be used to design personalized interventions that help improve mobility, encourage participation, and track rehabilitation progress. Since movement limitations vary widely, interventions should be tailored to the child’s specific needs and abilities.

Setting Individualized Movement Goals

Rather than relying on step count goals or standard activity recommendations, interventions should focus on functional movement improvements that enhance a child’s ability to engage in daily activities.

• Encouraging gradual increases in active participation (e.g., longer periods of wheelchair propulsion, more frequent posture changes).
• Incorporating play-based movement strategies to keep physical activity engaging and motivating.
• Using movement tracking as a feedback tool to help children and caregivers monitor progress.

Integrating Activity Data into Rehabilitation Programs

Activity data can provide valuable feedback for therapists and clinicians, allowing for real-time adjustments to therapy plans.

• Tracking improvements in movement efficiency and endurance helps refine rehabilitation strategies.
• Identifying periods of low activity can signal fatigue, discomfort, or barriers to participation.
• Comparing pre- and post-therapy movement data provides objective measures of intervention effectiveness.

Supporting Caregivers and Educators with Actionable Insights

Parents, caregivers, and teachers play a key role in encouraging physical activity in children with mobility limitations. Providing interpretable data and practical recommendations can help them better support movement participation.

• Personalized activity reports help caregivers understand mobility trends and adjust daily routines accordingly.
• Simple movement strategies for school and home (e.g., scheduled movement breaks, adaptive PE activities).
• Encouraging integration of movement into social activities to improve participation and quality of life.

By leveraging wearable data not just for measurement but for action, researchers and clinicians can create more effective, engaging, and meaningful physical activity interventions for children with mobility limitations.

7. Conclusion and Recommendations

Assessing physical activity in children with mobility limitations requires a shift from traditional step-based measurements to a more holistic approach that considers functional movement, adaptive mobility strategies, and participation levels. Standard activity trackers often fail to capture the full range of movement in this population, making it necessary to use alternative assessment methods and customized data analysis techniques.

Key takeaways include:

• Activity assessment should go beyond step counts to capture upper-body movement, seated activity, and assisted mobility.
• Wearable sensors should be positioned strategically based on the child’s mobility status (e.g., wrist for arm movement, push-rim for wheelchair users, waist for posture tracking).
• Combining multiple assessment tools (accelerometers, observational scales, caregiver-reported data) provides a more complete picture of movement patterns.
• Data analysis should focus on functional movement rather than raw intensity metrics, ensuring that adaptive movement strategies are properly accounted for.
• Activity data can be used to support personalized interventions by helping clinicians adjust therapy plans, set individualized movement goals, and track rehabilitation progress.
• Providing meaningful feedback to caregivers and educators helps improve engagement and participation in daily physical activities.

By adapting assessment techniques to reflect the unique movement patterns of children with mobility limitations, researchers and clinicians can gain more accurate, actionable insights into physical activity and design interventions that promote health, independence, and participation.

Call to Action

For more guidance on selecting the best device for your study, explore Fibion’s solutions for sedentary behaviors and physical activity research.

You may also book a video call with our expert or ask for a quote.