Top Alternatives to Bittium Faros for Cardiac Monitoring in 2025

Cardiac monitoring is a cornerstone of modern healthcare and research, helping to track heart health, detect arrhythmias, and assess recovery. While the Bittium Faros is a well-regarded ECG monitoring device, other options might be better suited to your specific needs. This article explores the top alternatives, emphasizing their features, benefits, and use cases.

1. Fibion Flash: The Best Affordable All-in-One Solution

The Fibion Flash offers a powerful, versatile, and budget-friendly alternative for cardiac monitoring and research.

  • Key Features:
    • Measures single-lead ECG, heart rate variability (HRV), and heart rate, capturing the full ECG curve.
    • Streams data in real-time to smartphones and cloud platforms or records it in its large internal memory for later analysis.
    • Equipped with a 9-axis motion sensor (accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer), providing more comprehensive movement data compared to devices with only an accelerometer.
    • Tiny and ultra-thin design, ensuring maximum comfort for participants.
    • Can be worn with a chest belt or different types of electrodes, offering flexibility in application.
    • Includes a well-documented API and SDK, enabling easy integration and customization for research needs.
Advertisement banner for Fibion, featuring a testimonial from Terje Gjøvaag, PhD. He states that the product is easy to use and implement for projects. His photo is on the right, ensuring a professional touch to our banneres.
  • Benefits:
    • Long battery life with a replaceable CR2025 battery ensures uninterrupted data collection.
    • Compatibility with Kubios HRV software for advanced data analysis.
    • Affordable pricing and bulk discounts make it suitable for large-scale studies.
  • Applications:
    • Long-term health monitoring, recovery assessment, sleep studies, and physical activity research.

Fibion Flash’s affordability, advanced features, and customizability make it a standout choice for researchers and clinicians.

2. ActiHeart

A webpage for the Actiheart 5 device by CamNtech, ideal for researchers. It highlights the lightweight, wearable, and waterproof design tailored for monitoring ECG, heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), and energy expenditure.

The ActiHeart is a trusted device for ECG and HRV monitoring, especially in research settings.

  • Key Features:
    • Combines a chest-worn ECG monitor with a built-in accelerometer for dual-functionality.
    • Provides high-quality HRV and physical activity data, ensuring comprehensive health insights.
    • Offers customizable sampling rates to meet specific research requirements.
    • Lightweight and durable, making it suitable for long-term monitoring in various conditions.
    • Proven reliability in stress tests, recovery monitoring, and sleep research.

The ActiHeart is a top choice for studies requiring high-precision HRV and ECG data, particularly in controlled environments.

3. BioPatch by BioTelemetry

The BioPatch is a clinically approved device for event monitoring and ECG recording in medical and research settings.

  • Key Features:
    • Provides real-time ECG monitoring with high fidelity.
    • Designed for patient compliance with a lightweight and discreet form factor.
    • Integrates with healthcare systems for seamless data sharing.
  • Benefits:
    • Clinically validated for use in diagnostic and therapeutic settings.
    • Excellent for monitoring arrhythmias and post-operative cardiac conditions.
    • Offers continuous data capture, suitable for short-term and mid-term studies.

The BioPatch is a powerful tool for medical-grade cardiac monitoring, ideal for hospital-based studies and clinical trials.

Factors to Consider When Choosing a Cardiac Monitoring Device

When selecting a cardiac monitoring device, it’s essential to prioritize:

  • Accuracy: Ensure the device provides high-quality ECG and HRV data.
  • Comfort: Lightweight and non-intrusive designs improve participant compliance.
  • Connectivity: Look for devices that stream data to smartphones or cloud platforms.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Consider options with competitive pricing and bulk discounts.
  • Software Integration: Devices compatible with analysis tools like Kubios HRV save time and enhance insights.

Conclusion

Choosing the right cardiac monitoring device depends on your research goals, budget, and specific needs. The Fibion Flash leads the list of alternatives due to its affordability, advanced features like single-lead ECG monitoring, real-time and offline data recording, comprehensive 9-axis motion sensing, and flexible wear options.

Call to Action

📅 If you want to learn more about Fibion Flash, do not hesitate to book a video call with our expert Dr. Miriam Cabrita, or to ask for a quote.

Man wearing a white shirt, smiling, with text: "Book a Call, Connect via WhatsApp." Name displayed is Dr. Olli Tikkanen.

Frequently asked questions:

What are the best alternatives to the Bittium Faros? +

Top alternatives to the Bittium Faros include the Fibion Flash, ActiHeart, and BioPatch. These devices offer advanced features such as single-lead ECG monitoring, motion sensing, and real-time data streaming, making them suitable for various research and clinical applications.

Why is Fibion Flash considered a great alternative? +

The Fibion Flash is affordable, highly versatile, and equipped with advanced features like single-lead ECG monitoring, a 9-axis motion sensor, real-time streaming, and customizability with its API and SDK. It’s an excellent choice for research groups on a budget.

What makes ActiHeart suitable for research purposes? +

ActiHeart combines ECG and HRV monitoring with a built-in accelerometer, offering precise data for health insights. It’s lightweight, customizable, and ideal for long-term monitoring in research settings.

How does BioPatch differ from other cardiac monitors? +

The BioPatch is a clinically validated device for high-fidelity ECG monitoring. It’s lightweight, integrates with healthcare systems, and is suitable for arrhythmia detection and post-operative monitoring, making it ideal for clinical trials and hospital-based studies.

What factors should I consider when choosing a cardiac monitoring device? +

When choosing a device, prioritize accuracy, comfort, connectivity, cost-effectiveness, and compatibility with analysis software like Kubios HRV. These factors ensure reliable data collection and analysis for your research or clinical needs.

Disclaimer

Disclaimer: The brand names and product names mentioned in this article, including ActiHeart and BioPatch by BioTelemetry, are trademarks of their respective owners. Our use of these names does not imply ownership or affiliation with the respective companies.

This article is for informational purposes only and aims to provide an overview of alternative cardiac monitoring devices, highlighting their features, benefits, and applications based on publicly available information. The information provided herein is intended for general informational purposes and may not reflect the latest updates or specifications. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, please refer to the official websites of ActiHeart and BioPatch by BioTelemetry.

We make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability of the information presented in this article. Any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk. All trademarks and registered trademarks mentioned herein belong to their respective owners.

Picture of Samad Esmaeilzadeh

Samad Esmaeilzadeh

Sign up for our Newsletter

Questions? Ask about Fibion!

Fill out the form below, and we will be in touch shortly.