Essential Steps for Planning a Physical Activity Study in Children and Adolescents

1. Introduction

Studying physical activity in children and adolescents provides valuable insights into health behaviors, developmental patterns, and intervention effectiveness. Regular movement is essential for physical and cognitive development, but many children do not meet recommended activity levels. By conducting well-designed research, scientists and health professionals can better understand how activity levels change across different ages and settings, leading to improved policies and interventions.

Designing a reliable and effective study requires careful planning. Children and adolescents have unique movement patterns, varying levels of compliance, and different activity contexts compared to adults. Researchers must consider measurement tools, study duration, participant engagement, and ethical concerns to ensure high-quality data collection. This article outlines key steps for planning a successful physical activity study in younger populations.

2. Defining Study Objectives and Research Questions

A clear study objective is essential for choosing the right methods, devices, and data analysis strategies. The research focus will determine whether the study aims to measure overall physical activity levels, compare specific interventions, or analyze movement patterns in different settings.

Key aspects to consider include:

• Primary study goal:
  • Are you investigating total daily physical activity, or do you want to track specific movement behaviors (e.g., sedentary time, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity)?
  • Will the study assess natural activity patterns, or is it evaluating an exercise intervention or school-based program?
• Target age group:
  • Preschoolers, school-aged children, and adolescents have different activity levels and compliance challenges.
  • Younger children may require more caregiver involvement, while older children can provide self-reported activity data.
• Measurement setting and timeframe:
  • Should the study track only school-time activity, or will it include after-school, weekends, and seasonal variations?
  • How long will the study last—a few days, weeks, or several months?

Clearly defining these aspects helps in selecting appropriate devices, study designs, and compliance strategies to ensure accurate and useful data.

3. Selecting the Right Measurement Tools and Methods

Choosing the right measurement tool is critical for ensuring data accuracy, participant compliance, and feasibility. Researchers must decide whether to use objective methods (wearable devices like accelerometers) or subjective methods (self-reports and activity logs). In most cases, objective measurements provide higher accuracy, especially for younger children who may struggle with self-reporting.

Objective vs. Subjective Measurement Methods

• Accelerometers and wearables
  • Provide real-time, continuous tracking of movement.
  • Reduce bias and recall errors common in self-reported data.
  • Require participant compliance to ensure wear time is sufficient.
• Self-reports and activity logs
  • Useful for older children and adolescents who can recall activity patterns.
  • Subject to overestimation or underreporting due to memory bias.
  • Best used as a supplement to objective measures rather than a standalone method.

Best Devices for Different Study Goals

The ideal device depends on the research question and study constraints. Each device placement has strengths and limitations.

• Wrist-worn accelerometers
  • Highest compliance due to ease of wear.
  • Suitable for tracking overall movement trends.
  • May overestimate activity due to hand gestures.
• Waist-worn accelerometers
  • Commonly used for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) assessment.
  • Provides good intensity estimates but does not differentiate between sitting and standing.
• Thigh-worn accelerometers
  • Best for distinguishing sedentary time from standing and walking.
  • More intrusive but provides detailed posture data.
• Heart rate monitors (ECG-based or PPG-based)
  • Useful for tracking exercise intensity and physiological responses.
  • Not ideal for general activity measurement, as heart rate may remain stable during low-intensity movements.

The choice of device should balance data accuracy, ease of use, and participant burden to maximize study success and compliance.

4. Ensuring Compliance and Participant Engagement

Compliance is one of the biggest challenges in physical activity studies involving children and adolescents. Unlike adults, younger participants may not fully understand the importance of wearing devices consistently, and external factors like comfort, parental support, and school environment play a crucial role in adherence. Researchers must implement strategies that encourage high wear time and minimize data loss.

Ease of Use is Crucial

Devices should be as simple and non-disruptive as possible to encourage compliance. If a device is uncomfortable, difficult to charge, or requires too much manual effort from parents, children are more likely to remove or forget it.

• Long battery life minimizes the need for frequent charging, making it easier for families to maintain compliance.
• Automatic data upload via cloud storage eliminates the need for manual downloads, reducing participant burden.
• Comfortable straps and lightweight designs improve wearability, making children less likely to remove the device.

Parental and School Involvement

Since children, especially younger ones, rely on adults for structure, involving parents and teachers helps improve compliance. Schools provide a controlled environment where teachers can remind students to wear devices, while parents can monitor compliance at home.

• Teachers can help integrate devices into the school routine, reminding students at the start of the day.
• Parents should receive clear, simple instructions on maintaining the device, including wear time and charging.
• Communication with parents and educators should emphasize the importance of the study and how their role supports its success.

Strategies to Maximize Adherence

Keeping children engaged in the study helps improve compliance. A structured reminder system and small incentives can encourage long-term participation.

• Using positive reinforcement, such as stickers, certificates, or small rewards, can make children more willing to keep devices on.
• Daily reminders via text or school announcements can reinforce wear time habits.
• Age-appropriate explanations help children understand why wearing the device matters.

5. Study Design and Data Collection Logistics

Planning the logistics of data collection is essential for capturing accurate, representative movement data. Researchers must decide how long the study will last, how frequently data will be collected, and how to handle missing data.

Duration of Data Collection

The length of the study depends on the research question and practical feasibility. Shorter studies may provide a snapshot of activity patterns, while longer studies help track behavior changes over time.

• Short-term studies (1–7 days)
  • Capture daily or weekly movement patterns.
  • Easier for participants to comply with short wear periods.
  • Risk of day-to-day variability affecting results.
• Long-term studies (weeks to months)
  • Provide a more complete picture of activity trends and seasonal variations.
  • Require more effort from participants, increasing the risk of non-compliance.

Sampling Frequency and Data Segmentation

Researchers must determine how frequently data should be recorded to balance data quality and battery life. Additionally, segmenting data into school hours, free time, and weekends allows for a more detailed understanding of movement behavior.

• High-frequency data sampling (e.g., every second) provides precise movement tracking but drains battery life faster.
• Lower-frequency data sampling (e.g., every minute) reduces detail but allows for longer wear periods.
• Timestamps and participant logs help separate structured vs. unstructured activity (e.g., PE class vs. recess).

Minimizing Missing Data

Missing data can occur when children forget to wear devices, remove them due to discomfort, or experience technical malfunctions. Planning ahead can reduce data loss and ensure a more complete dataset.

• Using backup devices allows quick replacements if a device is lost or damaged.
• Providing extra reminders (teacher announcements, parental text messages) helps children remember to wear their devices.
• Collecting data across multiple days accounts for variability in school schedules and activity routines.

6. Data Processing and Analysis

Once data is collected, researchers must process, clean, and analyze it to extract meaningful insights. Children’s movement patterns are often irregular and high-intensity, requiring careful data handling to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Choosing Appropriate Data Processing Techniques

Accelerometer data is collected in raw form and must be filtered and processed to determine different activity levels. The choice of epoch length (time window for data averaging) affects how movement is classified.

• Short epochs (e.g., 5 seconds) work well for young children, who have rapid bursts of movement.
• Longer epochs (e.g., 60 seconds) may smooth out data but risk missing short activity bursts common in children.

Interpreting Movement Data

Physical activity levels are categorized into light, moderate, and vigorous intensities. Understanding these patterns requires applying validated cut-off points specific to children’s movement behaviors.

• Light activity: Slow walking, standing, fidgeting.
• Moderate activity: Brisk walking, active play.
• Vigorous activity: Running, jumping, sports participation.

Common Pitfalls in Data Analysis

Errors in data processing can lead to misclassification of movement, affecting study conclusions. Researchers should take precautions to avoid common issues.

• Wrist-worn accelerometers may misclassify fidgeting as activity, leading to overestimations of movement levels.
• Device non-wear periods must be accounted for to prevent false assumptions about sedentary time.
• Data variability due to differences in school schedules and free time should be considered when comparing participants.

Analyzing physical activity in children requires a tailored approach, ensuring that age-specific movement behaviors are accurately captured and interpreted.

7. Ethical Considerations and Study Approval

Conducting physical activity research in children and adolescents requires strict adherence to ethical guidelines. Researchers must ensure that data collection is safe, non-intrusive, and respectful of participants’ rights. Involving parents, teachers, and school administrators in the process helps build trust and improves study participation.

Informed Consent and Ethical Approval

Before starting data collection, researchers must obtain ethical approval from institutional review boards (IRBs) or equivalent ethics committees. This ensures that the study follows regulations for child research and data privacy.

• Parental consent and child assent are required, as minors cannot provide legal consent themselves.
• Consent forms should be simple and clear, explaining study goals, device use, and data security.
• Schools and community stakeholders should be informed about the study’s potential benefits and any disruptions it may cause.

Data Privacy and Security

Collecting movement data involves handling sensitive participant information, so researchers must take steps to protect privacy and confidentiality.

• Data should be anonymized to prevent participant identification.
• Secure storage and encryption should be used to protect collected data.
• Participants and parents should be informed about how data will be used and stored.

Minimizing Participant Burden

To maintain ethical research practices, studies should be designed to minimize inconvenience for participants.

• Devices should be non-intrusive and comfortable to wear.
• Study procedures should fit into children’s normal daily routines without causing major disruptions.
• Researchers should regularly check in with participants and their families to address concerns and maintain engagement.

8. Conclusion and Recommendations

Planning a physical activity study in children and adolescents requires careful consideration of study objectives, device selection, participant compliance, data collection logistics, and ethical guidelines. Each of these factors plays a role in ensuring high-quality, reliable data while maintaining participant well-being and engagement.

Key takeaways include:

• Clearly define whether the study focuses on general activity levels, sedentary behavior, or intervention effectiveness.
• Choose objective measurement tools like accelerometers to improve data accuracy, while ensuring devices are comfortable and easy to use.
• Increase participant compliance through parental involvement, teacher support, and structured reminders.
• Plan data collection logistics carefully to minimize missing data and maximize study efficiency.
• Follow ethical guidelines, ensuring privacy, informed consent, and minimal participant burden.

By following these essential steps, researchers can design effective studies that provide meaningful insights into children’s movement behaviors, ultimately contributing to better public health policies and intervention strategies.

Call to Action

For more guidance on selecting the best device for your study, explore Fibion’s solutions for sedentary behaviors and physical activity research.

You may also book a video call with our expert or ask for a quote.